← Launch hub

Labor Day flow · the retest

THE SECOND SCORE

Value · product-free Tue Oct 20 · 11:00 ET copy for approval

The follow-up to the nine-test self-test. It opens on what a standard checkup does not do, names the system that has no reason to measure decline, and asks for a second score. Written to read the same for the 19 people who already have one and the roughly 300,000 who do not.

📈 The page the button opens · nine tests, four domains ↗ The August send · RPR $0.097 → Araujo 2022 · the study →

The email · for approval · Tue Oct 20, 11:00 ET

BF
Antonio <antonio@blackforestsupplements.com>
Worth knowing, Michael
Nine tests your annual physical will never run.

Hey Michael,

This is something you need to hear directly from me.

Your annual physical will not time you getting off the floor

To your health,
Antonio
CEO, Black Forest Supplements

P.S.

Black Forest Supplements · You are receiving this because you subscribed. Unsubscribe.

The email as plain textevery word of the send, both images includedhover to open · click to pin
SUBJECT LINE
Worth knowing, {{ person.first_name|default:'' }}          (B: Thinking of you, {{ person.first_name|default:'' }})
PREVIEW TEXT
Nine tests your annual physical will never run.
WRAPPER (live text above the image)
Hey {{ person.first_name|default:'' }},
This is something you need to hear directly from me.
BODY IMAGE (rendered as one PNG, alt text "Your annual physical will not time you getting off the floor")
Your annual physical will not time you getting off the floor.

It will not test your grip. It will not stand you on one leg. It will not measure how fast you cross a room.

Every one of those has been followed forward in a published study to see who was still alive years later. All of them are free. None of them are in a standard checkup.

A system that bills for treatment has no reason to measure decline.

Black Forest did not start because the world needed another supplement company. It started because the people who should be handing you this information are not.

So we built the measurement ourselves. Nine tests. Four domains. Twenty minutes, and six of them need nothing but a floor.

What the research behind them found:

1. Of 1,702 adults who could hold a ten-second one-leg stand, 4.6% had died seven years on. Of those who could not, 17.5% had.
2. Across 139,691 people in 17 countries, grip strength predicted death more accurately than systolic blood pressure did.
3. In 2,002 adults, every single point on the sit-to-stand test meant 21% better survival.
Araujo, Br J Sports Med 2022 · Leong, The Lancet 2015 · Brito, Eur J Prev Cardiol 2014

TAKE THE TEST

Twenty minutes, tonight when you are home. Free, and not on our website.

Why I am sending it a second time.

One score tells you where you stand. Two tells you which way you are going. The page keeps your number now, so running it again puts both side by side and names whether your weakest domain moved or held.

None of these studies show that training a test changes what it predicts. They show the number is worth knowing, and worth knowing twice.

Not to scare you. To give you something you can actually measure.
WRAPPER (live text below the image)
To your health,
Antonio
CEO, Black Forest Supplements
P.S. IMAGE (its own PNG, below the sign-off)
P.S. This test is not listed on our website and it will not be. It stays where it is, for the people on this list. If someone you love needs it, forward them this email rather than the link.
FOOTER
Black Forest Supplements - You are receiving this because you subscribed. Unsubscribe.
LINK ON BOTH IMAGES
https://longevity-predictor-test.blackforestsupplements.com/?s={{ person.four_tests_score|default:'' }}&m={{ person.four_tests_max|default:'' }}&w={{ person.four_tests_weakest|default:''|urlencode }}&d={{ person.four_tests_completed_at|default:'' }}

Body image 307 words, P.S. image 39, live wrapper text 20. Both images carry the personalised URL with all four merge tags and the urlencode filter. Images rendered from the approved copy at the canon 564px slot; the designer sets the final artwork.

The seven beats this had to carry

Is the subject and wrapper backed by data

Yes, now. The first two drafts were not. They obeyed the subject-line rules and had never been seed tested, which is not the same thing.

The pair we are shipping “Worth knowing,” + “This is something you need to hear directly from me.”92.4% inbox
Times that exact pair has been seed testedn=4
Spam rate on the pair0.7%
Live wrapper words length is the real lever, target under 3020
What August shipped “Worth knowing, !” + the Wednesday wrapper85.2% inbox

Drop the exclamation mark. “Worth knowing,” places at 93.1% across its own tests while “Worth knowing, !” places at 77.8% over seventeen. August shipped the version with the mark.

measured pairSubject A and the wrapper were tested together, which is the bar the corpus rule sets. Never pair a validated subject with an unvalidated wrapper.
untestedSubject B, “Thinking of you,”, is the best placed stem at n=4 but has never been tested with this wrapper. It needs its own lookup before it ships.
withdrawnMy earlier picks, “Nobody checked this” and “This one is yours”, appear nowhere in 613 seed tests. Rule-compliant, unmeasured, and replaced.

Source: the GlockApps corpus, 613 valid seed tests from 2025-10-10 to 2026-10-09, regenerated by automation/scripts/build_glockapps_reference.py. Pairings via scripts/find_tested_pair.py.

Where it scores

Soap Opera Sequence7.3
Hook / Story / Offer8.2
The 3 Closes7.3
BFS 4A-4G + Voice Guide9.1
Antonio's RPR scale4.0

Five lenses, shown apart because they disagree. The story lenses moved up from the previous draft because this version has a villain, a mission beat and real scarcity. Antonio’s number did not move, and will not, because it is a verdict on a product-free slot rather than on the writing.

1 · Brunson Soap Opera Sequencesix beats, urgency still the soft onehover to open · click to pin7.3
1 Set the stage Opens on what the reader’s own doctor will not do. Concrete, immediate, no warm-up.8.0
2 High drama, the wall Three cohort studies and a named villain: a system with no reason to measure decline.8.5
3 Epiphany One score tells you where you stand, two tell you which way you are going.8.0
4 Hidden benefits Free, twenty minutes, not public, and the page now remembers your number.7.5
5 Urgency and CTA CTA is strong and the urgency is still soft. Nothing expires.5.0
Forward loop The P.S. asks them to forward the email rather than the link, which is a loop and a gate at once.7.0

The forward loop is fixed: the P.S. asks them to forward the email rather than the link, which keeps the page gated while spreading it. Urgency stays deliberate.

2 · Hook / Story / Offerthe strongest of the three story lenseshover to open · click to pin8.2
Hook "Your annual physical will not time you getting off the floor." Specific, unexpected, true.8.5
Story The mission beat carries it: Black Forest exists because nobody else hands this over.8.0
Offer Free, twenty minutes, and exclusive. The exclusivity is verified, not asserted.8.0

The hook is the best line in the email and the offer is exclusive in a way we can prove.

3 · The 3 Closesscarcity now real rather than absenthover to open · click to pin7.3
Emotional Mortality is in every statistic and the copy never gloats about it.7.5
Logical Three studies, three populations, each with its journal named.8.5
Fear of loss No deadline, but "not on our website and not in search" supplies real scarcity.6.0

Fear of loss rose because the page genuinely is not public. Nothing was invented to get there.

4 · BFS 4A-4G and the Voice Guidethe craft audit, every blocker clearhover to open · click to pin9.1
4A Sequence Problem, mission, proof, page earned, no offer.9.5
4B Subject Four words plus the name, broad emotional loop, no CAPS or emoji.9.0
4C Body Opens on the industry problem, data by line four, reframe in the villain line.9.5
4D CTA Two CTAs, the optimal count, both inside images per house practice.8.5
4E Urgency No false deadline. Scarcity is a verified fact about the page.9.0
4F Voice Names a system, not a conspiracy. No politics, no body emojis.9.0
4G Word count 305w body image. Above the 250 band, matching Friday’s shipped winner.8.5
BVG 10-point Ten of ten plus the density items. One antithesis pair, inside the cap.9.5

Over the 250-word band on purpose, matching Friday’s shipped winner at roughly 300 words.

5 · Antonio’s Klaviyo scalelive pull, RPR $0.097 against a $1.00 pass linehover to open · click to pin4
Revenue per recipient the decision metric$0.097
Conversion rate the tiebreaker0.132%
Recipients 205,944 delivered after bounces206,229
Attributed revenue 365-day window$20,032
Open rate context only, never raises this score44.4%
Click to open benchmark 10 to 11%1.9%

Below the worst flow he rated ($0.47 = 4/10). Measured on the August send, the closest comparable.

What is keeping it from a 10
  1. $0.097 against a $1.00 pass line. No copy fix exists. A product-free send cannot clear a bar built for dedicated SKU flows.
  2. 0.132% conversion. 206,229 recipients produced about 272 orders. The test page ends with an SMS ask and no product path.
  3. 1.9% click to open against a 10 to 11% benchmark. One CTA, inside an image. An HTML button above the image has never been tried here.
What a 10/10 would look like

This body unchanged, a real button above the image, and a second send two days later built on the weakest domain the page just measured. That is the only place in this sequence a product belongs.

Open items

page, not emailTwelve weeks is the page’s own promise, in four places, landing 20 Nov. This send is early against it. The copy counts no weeks, so nothing shipping is wrong.
changed pre-sendAntonio: the test needs stairs, a bar and clear floor, and people open at a desk. All 30 submissions landed in the two weeks around the August send and none since. The CTA caption now reads “tonight when you are home” rather than implying it happens at the click. Wrapper untouched, because it is a measured pair.
verifiedThe exclusivity claim is true: noindex on the page, zero links from the store homepage, checked 19 Oct.
settledLeong is cited for grip strength only, never next to the bar hang, because a hang is a proxy and must not carry that figure.
Reaches fewer returning readers than the brief assumed. 30 people have a stored result, 19 have a usable email address, and 13 of those are already SMS subscribed. The other 11 gave a phone number in August and cannot be reached by this email at all.

Copy on disk at campaigns/labor-day-2026/s2b-retest/, with the two earlier drafts kept beside it. Araujo, Br J Sports Med 2022;56(17):975-980. Leong, The Lancet 2015;386(9990):266-273. Brito, Eur J Prev Cardiol 2014;21(7):892-898. Criterion 5 from automation/scripts/rate_copy_live.py, pulled live 19 Oct 2026.